In our Brussels to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 37 minutes, completing the 1108km route in 10h 39min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 39min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~203 kWh
- Distance: 1108km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 39min |
11h 16min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~199 kWh |
~200 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (14 min, 13% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
AVIA Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1108km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 1h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons