In our Vienna to Brussels EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 39 minutes, completing the 1106km route in 10h 36min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 36min (39 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~203 kWh
- Distance: 1106km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 36min |
11h 15min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~199 kWh |
~200 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 17% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EDEKA Hartmannsgruber Lagerhausstraße (10 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Mer McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 39-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1106km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 1h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons