In our Vienna to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 44 minutes, completing the 1241km route in 11h 47min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 47min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~228 kWh
- Distance: 1241km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 47min |
12h 31min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~223 kWh |
~223 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 19% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (14 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
BFS Business Fleet Services (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Dannstadt Ost (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (21 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1241km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons