In our Vienna to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 47 minutes, completing the 1059km route in 11h 25min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 25min (47 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~194 kWh
- Distance: 1059km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 25min |
12h 12min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~191 kWh |
~191 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 43% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (17 min, 11% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 23% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Szent Gellért pihenőhely (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Timisoara (20 min, 17% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Gavana (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 47-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1059km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons