In our Bucharest to Vienna EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 43 minutes, completing the 1059km route in 11h 21min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 21min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~194 kWh
- Distance: 1059km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 21min |
12h 4min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~191 kWh |
~191 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 17% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (21 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (16 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1059km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons