In our Brussels to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 120 minutes, completing the 1794km route in 17h 31min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 31min (120 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~279 kWh
- Distance: 1794km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 31min |
19h 31min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
2h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~323 kWh |
~323 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Targowa Górka (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (11 min, 16% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Grabower Straße (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Koryta (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen A2 MOP Krzyżowniki (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Gościniec Zacisze (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Mogiły (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (28 min, 10% → 80%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 120-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1794km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 2h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~279 kWh vs ~285 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons