In our Brussels to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 43 minutes, completing the 1290km route in 12h 39min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 39min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1290km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 39min |
13h 22min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Hub Suben (10 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (14 min, 13% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
AVIA Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Kammern (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1290km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons