In our Zagreb to Brussels EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 42 minutes, completing the 1285km route in 12h 33min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 33min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~236 kWh
- Distance: 1285km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 33min |
13h 15min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (10 min, 17% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (13 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 42-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1285km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons