In our Brussels to Zagreb EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 1295km route in 13h 35min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 35min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 37min
- Energy: ~206 kWh
- Distance: 1295km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 52min |
13h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
1h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
Medenbach West (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Euro Hotel (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
EWE Go McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Turmöl Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Raststation Kammern (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (15 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (12 min, 15% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Mer McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Rastpark24 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Raststation Kammern (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1295km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 37min vs 1h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~206 kWh vs ~219 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons