In our Bucharest to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1144km route in 13h 51min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 51min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~187 kWh
- Distance: 1144km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 51min |
14h 1min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
43min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~206 kWh |
~205 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrol Studena (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fines (10 min, 39% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
IKEA (15 min, 21% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrol Studena (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Fines (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Skotina dir Athen (13 min, 20% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1144km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~187 kWh vs ~205 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons