In our Bucharest to Copenhagen EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 20 minutes, completing the 2110km route in 24h 1min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 1min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2110km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 1min |
24h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pávov Sever (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Lamačská cesta (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Alten Mälzerei (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 20-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2110km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~387 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons