In our Copenhagen to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 16 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 9min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 9min |
24h 25min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Kbelská (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (12 min, 11% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Netto / Getränke Hoffmann (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (15 min, 18% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~386 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons