In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 19 minutes, completing the 2298km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~375 kWh
- Distance: 2298km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
23h 22min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY PADO Shopping Galerien (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2298km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 1h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~375 kWh vs ~422 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons