In our Madrid to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 1923km route in 19h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 49min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~314 kWh
- Distance: 1923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 49min |
20h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~347 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana, Lleida (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages, Bages (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice, La Almunia de Doña Godina (11 min, 45% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala, Sallent (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages, Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Ceriale Sud, Ceriale (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Parcheggio del Cimitero, Chiesina Uzzanese (20 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~314 kWh vs ~353 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons