In our Madrid to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 1250km route in 12h 43min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 43min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~204 kWh
- Distance: 1250km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 43min |
12h 48min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
41min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~225 kWh |
~225 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (12 min, 21% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Bédenac Est (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Super U (15 min, 24% → 76%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger E.Leclerc Express (11 min, 17% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger N10 (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette (10 min, 23% → 65%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1250km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~204 kWh vs ~229 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons