In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Seal U Design by 106 minutes, completing the 2298km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (106 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~375 kWh
- Distance: 2298km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Seal U Design |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
24h 49min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
BYD Seal U Design Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (21 min, 23% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arrabona pihenõ északi (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle Wientalstraße (19 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Aistersheim (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Total Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 9:
ATU (13 min, 14% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Tankstelle Südstraße (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (20 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 106-minute advantage over BYD Seal U Design on this 2298km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~375 kWh vs ~500 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons