In our Paris to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Seal U Design by 116 minutes, completing the 2303km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (116 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~376 kWh
- Distance: 2303km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Seal U Design |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
24h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
3h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~415 kWh |
~413 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
BYD Seal U Design Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (10 min, 33% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Fun Park (11 min, 13% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (19 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Weierbachweg (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (25 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 116-minute advantage over BYD Seal U Design on this 2303km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 3h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~376 kWh vs ~501 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons