In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 81 minutes, completing the 2298km route in 22h 58min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 58min (81 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2298km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
22h 58min |
24h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
2h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (12 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Páty Nord (18 min, 13% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Hadikgasse (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Pendlerparkplatz (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Total Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Bonfelder Straße (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (17 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 81-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2298km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 2h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~400 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons