In our Budapest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 43 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 13h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 58min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~230 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
13h 58min |
14h 41min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~266 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (11 min, 20% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle (18 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (17 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 1h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~230 kWh vs ~257 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons