In our Bucharest to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 115 minutes, completing the 1861km route in 21h 24min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 24min (115 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
21h 24min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
2h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (19 min, 36% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Badia Nuova Ovest (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 76% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (48 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (26 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (17 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
Autogrill Po Ovest (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 115-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 2h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~325 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons