In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 93 minutes, completing the 1853km route in 22h 1min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 1min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~302 kWh
- Distance: 1853km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
22h 1min |
23h 34min |
| Charging time: |
2h 5min |
2h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~334 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (72 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (13 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Barje Jug (12 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 16% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (28 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (44 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 93-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1853km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 5min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~302 kWh vs ~323 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons