In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 60 minutes, completing the 1509km route in 14h 41min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 41min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~246 kWh
- Distance: 1509km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
14h 41min |
15h 41min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Mantova Village (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Green Deer Bavarian Hotel (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (10 min, 30% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Campogalliano Est (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Paganella Est (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofer (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Frankenwald Ost (11 min, 15% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1509km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~246 kWh vs ~263 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons