Which is faster from Bucharest to Stockholm: Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance or Renault 4 E-Tech 150?

The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance is faster, arriving 173 minutes sooner with 8 charging stops compared to 18 for the Renault 4 E-Tech 150.

How many charging stops does the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance need from Bucharest to Stockholm?

The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs 8 charging stops to complete the 2713km route from Bucharest to Stockholm, with a total travel time of 30h 58m.

What is the total travel time from Bucharest to Stockholm in an EV?

The travel time depends on the EV. The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance completes the 2713km route in 30h 58m, while the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 takes 33h 51m.

EV Duel

Virtual Electric Car Racing

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance vs Renault 4 E-Tech 150: Bucharest to Stockholm

Which EV is faster on the 2713km route? <strong>Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance</strong> wins by 173 minutes with 8 charging stops.

In our Bucharest to Stockholm EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 173 minutes, completing the 2713km route in 30h 58min. The key advantage? 10 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.

The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 18 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.

⚠️ Route direction matters! Charging stops may differ. See reverse direction: Stockholm → Bucharest

Winner

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance

Total time: 30h 58min (173 min faster)
Charging stops: 8
Charging time: 1h 34min
Energy: ~422 kWh
Distance: 2713km

Quick Comparison

Metric	Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance	Renault 4 E-Tech 150
Travel time	30h 58min	33h 51min
Charging time:	1h 34min	4h 17min
Charging stops:	8	18
Energy used	~488 kWh	~489 kWh

Charging Strategy Breakdown

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route

Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
Stop 1: OMV (10 min, 22% → 63%)
Stop 2: IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 11% → 55%)
Stop 3: IONITY Győr (10 min, 18% → 60%)
Stop 4: IONITY Pávov Sever (10 min, 11% → 56%)
Stop 5: Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
Stop 6: Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
Stop 7: Væggerløsevej (13 min, 20% → 71%)
Stop 8: IONITY Burger King (20 min, 10% → 79%)
Arrival: Stockholm

Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route

Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
Stop 1: MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 84%)
Stop 2: OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (24 min, 15% → 76%)
Stop 3: Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (26 min, 10% → 77%)
Stop 4: IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
Stop 5: Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
Stop 6: IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 56%)
Stop 7: Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 10% → 41%)
Stop 8: OC Karlov (15 min, 11% → 56%)
Stop 9: Kardausova DC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
Stop 10: SachsenEnergie City Center (11 min, 10% → 45%)
Stop 11: Rasthof Berstetal (11 min, 10% → 46%)
Stop 12: McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (16 min, 10% → 58%)
Stop 13: Raststätte Recknitz Ost (12 min, 10% → 50%)
Stop 14: Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
Stop 15: Fastned Barbecue barn (19 min, 10% → 64%)
Stop 16: IONITY Burger King (13 min, 10% → 51%)
Stop 17: OKQ8 Liljekonvaljvägen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
Stop 18: Circle K (13 min, 10% → 52%)
Arrival: Stockholm

Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won

The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 173-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2713km route. Key factors:

Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 18 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 34min vs 4h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~422 kWh vs ~431 kWh) means less time spent charging.

Related Comparisons

Explore More Routes

Reverse: Stockholm → Bucharest

Choose Your Contenders

Select 1-4 electric cars and race them across real routes

01 Vehicle

Select Vehicle

02 Vehicle

Select Vehicle

Add Vehicle

Compare Charging Networks

Select one vehicle and up to 4 networks to compare on a route

Select Vehicle

01 Vehicle

Select Vehicle

Select Networks to Compare

01 Network

Select Network

02 Network

Select Network

Add Network

Race in Progress

Speed:

0:00

0:00 0:00

Race these cars on other routes

See how Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance vs Renault 4 E-Tech 150 compares elsewhere

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance vs Renault 4 E-Tech 150: Bucharest to Stockholm

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance

Quick Comparison

Charging Strategy Breakdown

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route

Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route

Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won

Related Comparisons

Explore More Routes

Choose Your Contenders

Compare Charging Networks

Select Vehicle

Select Networks to Compare

Set Your Route

Race these cars on other routes

Other matchups on this route

Top EV Lists

From the Blog

Calculation Assumptions

Frequently Asked Questions

Select Vehicle

Select Network

Tesla Supercharger

EnBW

IONITY

EWE Go

NewMotion

Aral pulse

allego

be.energised

Recharge

Fastned

Circle K Charge

Pfalzwerke

Bilkraft

Ladenetz

Vattenfall

Enel Drive

Mer

Total EV Charge

Greenway

ALDI Sued

Kople

Smatrics

OMV eMotion

E.ON

innogy eRoaming

Comfortcharge

TEAG Mobil

LastMileSolutions

Electra

Greenflux

Clever

da emobil

ASPI

Chargepoint

ABC Lataus

Porsche

Virta

chargeIT mobility

GOFAST

Mer Norway

Norlys

Monta

EVN

ZSE

Salzburg AG

bp pulse

OKQ8

CEZ

Stromnetz Hamburg

Citywatt

Race Complete!

--

Vehicle Name

Specifications

Battery & Range

Charging

Charging Curve

Description