In our Bucharest to Warsaw EV duel, the Peugeot e-308 beats the Opel Ampera-e by 88 minutes, completing the 1273km route in 19h 44min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Opel Ampera-e's 338km range doesn't beat the Peugeot e-308's 320km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Peugeot e-308 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Peugeot e-308
- Total time: 19h 44min (88 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 48min
- Energy: ~183 kWh
- Distance: 1273km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Opel Ampera-e |
Peugeot e-308 |
| Travel time |
21h 12min |
19h 44min |
| Charging time: |
4h 11min |
2h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~229 kWh |
~229 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Opel Ampera-e Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (57 min, 13% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (50 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (26 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl (29 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Witolda (29 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen (35 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (15 min, 10% → 29%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Peugeot e-308 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (37 min, 12% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl (20 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Witolda (41 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (11 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Peugeot e-308 Won
The Peugeot e-308 achieved a 88-minute advantage over Opel Ampera-e on this 1273km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 48min vs 4h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~183 kWh vs ~226 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons