In our Bucharest to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 33 minutes, completing the 989km route in 12h 30min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 30min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~161 kWh
- Distance: 989km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 30min |
13h 3min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~178 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (19 min, 36% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (38 min, 26% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 989km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~161 kWh vs ~177 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons