In our Budapest to Athens EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 63 minutes, completing the 1476km route in 15h 38min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 38min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1476km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
15h 38min |
16h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
1h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~266 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 16% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV smer Beograd (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Skotina dir Athen (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 24% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1476km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons