In our Budapest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 42 minutes, completing the 1068km route in 10h 48min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 48min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~166 kWh
- Distance: 1068km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 48min |
11h 30min |
| Charging time: |
23min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Wientalstraße (10 min, 28% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Salzburger Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Franz-Marc-Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Migrol Service (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 42-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1068km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~166 kWh vs ~177 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons