In our Budapest to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 51 minutes, completing the 1347km route in 12h 53min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 53min (51 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~220 kWh
- Distance: 1347km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 53min |
13h 44min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~242 kWh |
~243 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (11 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Select Hotel (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Nentershausen Ost (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (13 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 51-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1347km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~220 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons