In our Budapest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 58 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 14h 2min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 2min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~241 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
14h 2min |
15h 0min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 26% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (19 min, 12% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (19 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire Reims Champagne Nord (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~241 kWh vs ~258 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons