In our Paris to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 58 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 13h 59min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 59min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~241 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
13h 59min |
14h 57min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Margaretengürtel (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (12 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 13% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's Hietzinger Kai (10 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 11% → 49%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~241 kWh vs ~258 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons