In our Paris to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 56 minutes, completing the 1249km route in 12h 39min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 39min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~204 kWh
- Distance: 1249km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
12h 39min |
13h 35min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~225 kWh |
~225 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire des Groies, Courcôme (13 min, 24% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hôtel Loreak, Bayonne (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Calle Herreros, Villagonzalo Pedernales (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine, Saint-Épain (10 min, 22% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire des Groies, Courcôme (11 min, 13% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne, Lormont (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (19 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
Repsol Lopidana, Vitoria-Gasteiz (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Carburantes, Lerma (19 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1249km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~204 kWh vs ~218 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons