In our Budapest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 79 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 13h 58min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 58min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~230 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 58min |
15h 17min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (11 min, 20% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 24% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Rasthausstraße (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Donautal Ost (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (23 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~230 kWh vs ~233 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons