In our Budapest to Sofia EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 56 minutes, completing the 769km route in 8h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 8h 4min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~132 kWh
- Distance: 769km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
| Travel time |
9h 0min |
8h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 46min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~138 kWh |
~138 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV smer Beograd (70 min, 11% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Sofia
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV smer Beograd (28 min, 30% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 56-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 769km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~132 kWh vs ~170 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons