In our Sofia to Budapest EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 43 minutes, completing the 763km route in 7h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 7h 55min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 29min
- Energy: ~131 kWh
- Distance: 763km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
| Travel time |
8h 38min |
7h 55min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
29min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~137 kWh |
~137 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (18 min, 53% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (44 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Budapest
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (19 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 43-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 763km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 29min vs 1h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~131 kWh vs ~168 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons