In our Budapest to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 63 minutes, completing the 1203km route in 14h 18min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 18min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~196 kWh
- Distance: 1203km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 18min |
15h 21min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
1h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~217 kWh |
~216 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xland (12 min, 32% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland Československej armády (13 min, 36% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Fabryczna (34 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (30 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1203km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~196 kWh vs ~199 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons