In our Köln to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 9 minutes, completing the 576km route in 5h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 48min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~91 kWh
- Distance: 576km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 57min |
5h 48min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~104 kWh |
~104 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Köln (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Euro Hotel (15 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
ATU Sigmundstraße (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Köln (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Euro Hotel (19 min, 17% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 9-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 576km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~91 kWh vs ~98 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons