In our Köln to Paris EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 6 minutes, completing the 484km route in 5h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 2min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~76 kWh
- Distance: 484km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 8min |
5h 2min |
| Charging time: |
28min |
21min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~87 kWh |
~87 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Köln (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (18 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Ressons Ouest, Antheuil-Portes (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Köln (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (21 min, 12% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 6-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 484km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~76 kWh vs ~82 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons