In our Copenhagen to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 120 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 9min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 9min (120 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 9min |
26h 9min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
3h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Kbelská (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (12 min, 11% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 58% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Wittstock (17 min, 21% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
SachsenEnergie City Center (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Kardausova DC (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Karlov (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 10:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (29 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 12:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 120-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 3h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~332 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons