In our Copenhagen to Riga EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 80 minutes, completing the 1291km route in 19h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 19h 47min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 3min
- Energy: ~203 kWh
- Distance: 1291km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 7min |
19h 47min |
| Charging time: |
2h 33min |
2h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 55% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Netto Loitzer Landstraße (10 min, 16% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Netto Lindenstraße Ahlbeck (21 min, 20% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Zientarskiego (26 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Volvo Drywa (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Lidl (44 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Vilniaus (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Girelė (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 58% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Nordoel (10 min, 25% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Nowokarsiborska (15 min, 34% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Armii Krajowej (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka (34 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (19 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
VS Express (13 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 80-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1291km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 3min vs 2h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~203 kWh vs ~219 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons