In our Düsseldorf to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 9 minutes, completing the 561km route in 5h 34min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 34min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 26min
- Energy: ~88 kWh
- Distance: 561km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 43min |
5h 34min |
| Charging time: |
31min |
26min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~101 kWh |
~101 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Düsseldorf (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Wiesenau (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Düsseldorf (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Lehrter See Süd (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Irxleben (16 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 9-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 561km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 26min vs 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~88 kWh vs ~95 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons