In our Düsseldorf to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 7 minutes, completing the 617km route in 6h 13min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 13min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~97 kWh
- Distance: 617km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 20min |
6h 13min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
34min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~111 kWh |
~111 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Düsseldorf (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (11 min, 36% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Düsseldorf (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Hotel Brunnenhof (23 min, 15% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 617km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~97 kWh vs ~105 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons