In our Helsinki to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 107 minutes, completing the 2085km route in 26h 30min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 30min (107 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2085km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
26h 30min |
28h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
3h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~377 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (28 min, 15% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (14 min, 17% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Purvciems (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Girelė (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Vilniaus (40 min, 10% → 100%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Południe (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Żnin Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Chociszewo (11 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
A.T.U (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 13:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 107-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2085km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 3h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~329 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons