In our Helsinki to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 89 minutes, completing the 1439km route in 20h 32min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 32min (89 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1439km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
20h 32min |
22h 1min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~259 kWh |
~259 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (32 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (13 min, 11% → 67%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (17 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Livonija (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K (66 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Krauz Oil (11 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
OTO Park Handlowy (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Stacja Paliw Moya Rymarska (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 89-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1439km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~235 kWh vs ~238 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons