In our Helsinki to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 100 minutes, completing the 2193km route in 33h 11min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 33h 11min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2193km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
33h 11min |
34h 51min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
3h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~395 kWh |
~396 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (13 min, 14% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Główna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (33 min, 14% → 85%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (11 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 6:
Zajazd Orchidea (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Audi Centre (66 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 10:
Maysternya Smaku (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland Sucedava (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 2193km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 26min vs 3h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons