In our Helsinki to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 53 minutes, completing the 2193km route in 33h 11min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 33h 11min (53 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2193km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
33h 11min |
34h 4min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~395 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (13 min, 14% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Główna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (33 min, 14% → 85%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (11 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Jono Dailidės (25 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Zajazd Orchidea (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Pogodna (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Audi Centre (56 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Maysternya Smaku (16 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Sucedava (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 53-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2193km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 26min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~359 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons