In our Helsinki to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 95 minutes, completing the 2477km route in 30h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 14min (95 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~404 kWh
- Distance: 2477km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
30h 14min |
31h 49min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
3h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~446 kWh |
~446 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (35 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Lucavsala (17 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K (67 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (16 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (16 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 10:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (15 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 95-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2477km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 3h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~404 kWh vs ~406 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons