In our Helsinki to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 88 minutes, completing the 2195km route in 32h 53min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 53min (88 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 11min
- Energy: ~342 kWh
- Distance: 2195km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
32h 53min |
34h 21min |
| Charging time: |
2h 11min |
3h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~395 kWh |
~403 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 19% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (33 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (27 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (22 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (29 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 5:
Park Handlowy Korkowa (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Revia Park (12 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
King Cross Leopolis (33 min, 10% → 91%)
-
Stop 9:
Maysternya Smaku (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland Sucedava (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Scorpion Exim (26 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 88-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2195km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 11min vs 3h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~342 kWh vs ~346 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons