In our Helsinki to Oslo EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 1009km route in 24h 12min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 24h 12min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 1009km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 29min |
24h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~182 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rinta-Joupin Autoliike (14 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (37 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
IKEA (12 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Preem Grums (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ykkös Cafe (10 min, 55% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OKQ8 Årstagatan (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1009km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 1h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~160 kWh vs ~171 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons