In our Helsinki to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 54 minutes, completing the 1685km route in 23h 16min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 23h 16min (54 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 29min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1685km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 10min |
23h 16min |
| Charging time: |
3h 8min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~303 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 17% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (37 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Daszyńskiego (25 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell (12 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Bolimów (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Hotel Na Półboru (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
ALDI (25 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Fabryczna (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Nowostawy (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
ALDI (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 54-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1685km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 29min vs 3h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~286 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons