In our Helsinki to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 111 minutes, completing the 2506km route in 31h 57min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 31h 57min (111 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 3min
- Energy: ~409 kWh
- Distance: 2506km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
31h 57min |
33h 48min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
3h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~451 kWh |
~453 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (25 min, 14% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (28 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (16 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (35 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP West (15 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (35 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (53 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 111-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 2506km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 3min vs 3h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~409 kWh vs ~571 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons